|
|
| |
|
Capture-recapture
models for estimating incidence
|
|
|
|
Funded
by:
|
|
MRC Training Fellowship
|
|
|
|
Study
team:
|
|
|
|
Dr
Jonathan Sterne
|
|
|
|
| Background: |
| Incidence
of stroke is often estimated using population-based registers. Any
register, however carefully conducted, is likely to miss some cases
and cases missed may differ from those captured (for example, in disease
severity). Any register not attempting to estimate the number of cases
missed will under-estimate the true incidence of disease. Capture-recapture
is often used to assess completeness of a register, although the usual
two source model relies on assumption of independence of sources and
equality of capture probability which are rarely satisfied in epidemiology. |
|
| Methods:
|
| We
compared traditional capure-recapture with recently-developed capture-recapture
models including covariates. The models including covariates were
used to estimate incidence of stroke using a population-based stroke
register (in South London , UK), allowing for the association of patient
characteristics with probability of capture. |
|
| Results: |
| 616
strokes were registered in 2 years. Probability of capture by the
register was associated with both demographic variables and the stroke-severity
indicators. The model without covariates underestimated the number
of non-fatal cases. The capture-recapture (including covariates) estimate
of the population size showed that the register was approximately
88% complete. Adjusting for the number of cases missed increased the
estimated incidence from 1.31 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.42) to 1.49 (95% CI
0.38 to 2.60) per 1000 people. The estimated incidence rate ratio
for black compared to white people decreased from 2.18 (95% CI 1.8
to 2.7) to 1.93 (95% CI 1.05 to 3.54) after correction for under-ascertainment. |
|
| Conclusion: |
| Using
these methods, data from an incomplete register can be used to calculate
both incidence and age-standardised incidence. Stroke registers might
be made more cost effective by using the combination of sources and
covariates which most accurately estimates population size, instead
of aiming for 100% completeness. Comparisons of incidence should only
use registers which have attempted to estimate the number and type
of cases missed. |
|
| References: |
| Tilling
K, Sterne JAC. Capture-recapture models including covariate effects.
American Journal of Epidemiology 1999; 149(4): 392-400. |
|
| Tilling
K, Sterne JAC, Wolfe CDA. Estimation of the incidence of stroke using
a capture-recapture model including covariates. International Journal
of Epidemiology (in press). |
|
|
|
|